Comments on: Does CSS / XHTML development pay YOU back? http://www.cssaddict.com/blog/hello-world-2/ Web Design Concepts Fri, 23 Jul 2010 09:33:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Andy http://www.cssaddict.com/blog/hello-world-2/comment-page-1/#comment-923 Andy Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:18:22 +0000 http://www.cssaddict.com/?p=1#comment-923 You're English is getting worse, you need to get back here a bit more often mate! X You’re English is getting worse, you need to get back here a bit more often mate!

X

]]> By: Berthapb http://www.cssaddict.com/blog/hello-world-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4 Berthapb Sun, 23 Mar 2008 05:01:52 +0000 http://www.cssaddict.com/?p=1#comment-4 thats it, guy thats it, guy

]]> By: Michael Persson http://www.cssaddict.com/blog/hello-world-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3 Michael Persson Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:42:27 +0000 http://www.cssaddict.com/?p=1#comment-3 I hear so often that the old school is easier and better than the newer and most standardized xhtml. Its for me all wrogn, i can control 99% of all items and alignment with the css and there is nothing easier then doing global changes and editing for the full website layout. My experience in the new field and updated and later technology is that "you cant teach a old dog to sit" Thats a swedish say and means older developer are negative to new technologies, same as i was until i tested and really got into the standard xhtml and css development. I was practising html without any type of standard thinking and my sites was maybe ok in the cross browser check but never the similarity i can do today. The best way to get better is to have external designers that make designes and the layout for the new ideas of web design and one will always be forced to find the solution for the concept delivered. I really love xhtm land css and I have also started to study DOM-scripting as the new java script standard to be more flexible and develop better dynamic solutions. The only bad thing with new technology is that one need to train new clients that still want to have popups or new windows to open from a link. I try to avoid it by unotrubsive DOM solutions and its the only way to not start having argument with clients that does not understand the technical standard evolution we all should face, accept and exercise as a daily matter. Michael Persson - xhtml and css development I hear so often that the old school is easier and better than the
newer and most standardized xhtml. Its for me all wrogn, i can control 99%
of all items and alignment with the css and there is nothing easier then
doing global changes and editing for the full website layout.

My experience in the new field and updated and later technology is that
“you cant teach a old dog to sit” Thats a swedish say and means older developer are negative to new technologies, same as i was until i tested and really got into the
standard xhtml and css development. I was practising html without
any type of standard thinking and my sites was maybe ok in the cross browser check but never the similarity i can do today.

The best way to get better is to have external designers that make
designes and the layout for the new ideas of web design and one
will always be forced to find the solution for the concept delivered.

I really love xhtm land css and I have also started to study DOM-scripting as the new java script standard to be more flexible and develop better dynamic solutions.

The only bad thing with new technology is that one need to train new
clients that still want to have popups or new windows to open from a link. I try to avoid it by unotrubsive DOM solutions and its the only way to not start having
argument with clients that does not understand the technical standard
evolution we all should face, accept and exercise as a daily matter.

Michael Persson – xhtml and css development

]]>